From: Thomas S H. <tha...@gm...> - 2010-12-11 06:13:29
|
I am a Sr engineer at Beyond Oblivion, we are using Moose in a 140T and growing setup. We are using kvm for virtual machines, the performance is adequate. We also tried a number of other distributed filesystems and moose was by far the best option. For what it is worth, glusterfs was a disaster, we saw rampant file corruption, and the distribution of files was inconsistent and unfortunately ceph is not ready yet, I figure moose will be giving it a run for its money when it is. -Thomas S Hatch On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jun Cheol Park <jun...@gm...>wrote: > One more question: > I am planning how to use KVM on MFS. Is there any use example of this > combination? > > Thanks, > > -Jun > > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jun Cheol Park > <jun...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to know how many use examples of MFS are in real > > production so far. And also wondering how big they are. > > > > Is there anyone who can give me comments on how substantially reliable > > MFS is for production? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > -Jun > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for > PL/SQL, > new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, > OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > moosefs-users mailing list > moo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moosefs-users > |