From: Anh K. H. <ky...@vi...> - 2010-09-20 14:19:31
|
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:11:43 +0700 Cuong Hoang Bui <bhc...@gm...> wrote: > I'm wondering about the storage backend for chunk servers. I have 2 > options 1. Using RAID for underly storage backend for chunk servers. > 2. Not use RAID, Just separate disks attached directly to OS. > > With RAID (maybe RAID 6) option, the solution is very good, but > take money for RAID card. > > With no RAID, I wonder about tolerance (disk failure). If I have 8 > disks attached directly to OS, for example I mount > as /mnt/sdb, /mnt/sdc,.., .mnt/sdh. If one of them failed, what > happens to data, also operations that's performing on this disk. > Please give me some advice. IMHO things depend on your "goal". If your goal is 2 or more, RAID isn't necessary (here the term "distributed"). As recommended from MFS docs, you should use RAID for mfsmaster/logger. -- Anh Ky Huynh |