Re: [Moosefs-users] git outdated

[Michał B. <mic...@ge...>]

[ ... snip ... ]
> > [MB] We plan to make it more automatic but I'm afraid it won't be in the
> next release.
> Do you mean 1.6.16 or 1.7 ? :)
[MB] For sure not 1.6.16 and maybe in some version in 1.7.x


[ ... snip ... ]
> > [MB] MooseFS is still developed mainly by Gemius as it is widely used in the
> company and the development is backed up by the community.
> OK. I haven't been able to find a place explaining code structure (call
> graphs, etc.). Does it already exist ?
[MB] No, there are no call graphs, no code structure overview prepared by us. Possibly Doxygen could make most of it?


> > And also thank you for the CentOS repo!
> You're welcome. Some people on CentOS mailing-list exprimed concerns about
> security of the RPMS. Quite normal, as I'm anonymous, recent user of MooseFS,
> I could have put anything in the source before building the repo (of course I
> did NOT do that:).
> Do you have a bit of workforce to verify* they are OK so you can « officialy »
> back them (I'll maintain them happilly if you want), or to host them so such
> doubt would not happen anymore ?
> Regards,
> *
> rpm -Uvh http://centos.kodros.fr/5/SRPMS/mfs-1.6.15-2.src.rpm
> wget
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/moosefs/files/moosefs/1.6.15/mfs-
> 1.6.15.tar.gz/download
> md5sum mfs-1.6.15.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/mfs-1.6.15.tar.gz
> result is 90749a0fb0e55c0013fae6e23a990bd9 for both here.
> and don't forget to take a look at /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/mfs.spec do check that
> nothing is applied to the sources :) Thanks,
[MB] Our technical team will look into these files and probably would incorporate them in one of the next releases.


Regards
Michał 


> Laurent Wandrebeck
> HYGEOS, Earth Observation Department / Observation de la Terre
> Euratechnologies
> 165 Avenue de Bretagne
> 59000 Lille, France
> tel: +33 3 20 08 24 98
> http://www.hygeos.com
> GPG fingerprint/Empreinte GPG: F5CA 37A4 6D03 A90C 7A1D  2A62 54E6 EF2C D17C
> F64C