From: Upinder S. B. <bh...@nc...> - 2006-09-22 08:38:28
|
Hi, Joe, The lack of backward compatibility is only in the implementation of function calls that SLI makes. The parser for SLI in MOOSE is actually the same as the one in GENESIS, that is, they use essentially the same yacc specification files. So, as and when functions are implemented, we will have a more nearly complete backward compatible implementation. -- Upi --=20 Upinder S. Bhalla National Centre for Biological Sciences, bh...@nc... Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, +91-80-2363-6420X3230 Bellary Road, Fax: +91-80-23636662 Bangalore 560065, INDIA Web: http://www.ncbs.res.in/~bhalla/index.html On Fri, September 22, 2006 3:41 am, Josef Svitak said: > I've been laboring under the impression that the moose sli was intended= to > be > 100% backward-compatible with the current genesis sli, but it doesn't > appear > that way. Where are the incompatibilities with what's already implmente= d? > Will > the workarounds be internal or will they require script modification? > > Thanks, > joe > > Software Engineer > Linux/OSX C/C++/Java > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Moose-g3-devel mailing list > Moo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moose-g3-devel > |