From: Luke-Jr <lu...@ar...> - 2004-02-08 06:19:43
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 28 January 2004 12:51 am, Luke-Jr wrote: > Is C-style escaping of common characters (\n, \r, \t, \v, \x##, etc) a go= od > idea? Including C-style's \### which uses octal or should \### use decimal > (or hex?)? Also, if number-based escaping is used, should it be octet-based or=20 character-based? Character-based would translate the value to UTF-8 and could accept a=20 variable-length number up to a 16-bit value. For example, \xFFFF, \d65535,= =20 \o200000, \xFF, \xF \x (for a null character). (Using variable-length numbe= rs=20 would, of course, be discouraged since it could easilly create bugs if the= =20 character following the escaped one was a valid digit). =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJdTnZl/BHdU+lYMRAhehAJ9ACWql1esncEupVjXjtCrU+rInbgCffIKu 8utozoE08zAegJuBJifYvJc=3D =3D3JQ/ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |