#333 Stock updates individual accounts - last update date incorrect

1.2.0
closed-out-of-date
nobody
None
5
2015-02-27
2014-07-16
Pat O
No

If you update the stocks for a given account, it only updates that account, yet the "Last Updated" changes for all accounts.

Discussion

  • Nikolay

    Nikolay - 2014-07-16

    There are only one variable for last succesfully updated prices date.
    We can add more variables for all accounts or update all accounts.
    Better to have additional field for all records but we can't provide it for current version.

     
    • Pat O

      Pat O - 2014-07-16

      I would like option to update all accounts - I have six accounts so it is
      annoying to have to manually click through and refresh all, I've never
      wanted to update just one and not the rest although others may.

      On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Nikolay vomikan@users.sf.net wrote:

      There are only one variable for last succesfully updated prices date.
      We can add more variables for all accounts or update all accounts.
      Better to have additional field for all records but we can't provide it
      for current version.


      Status: open
      Group: 1.1.0
      Created: Wed Jul 16, 2014 02:14 AM UTC by Pat O
      Last Updated: Wed Jul 16, 2014 02:14 AM UTC
      Owner: nobody

      If you update the stocks for a given account, it only updates that
      account, yet the "Last Updated" changes for all accounts.


      Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
      https://sourceforge.net/p/moneymanagerex/bugs/429/

      To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
      https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/

       
  • Gabriele

    Gabriele - 2014-07-16

    Ticket moved from /p/moneymanagerex/bugs/429/

     
  • Nikolay

    Nikolay - 2015-02-27
    • status: open --> closed-out-of-date
    • Group: 1.1.0 --> 1.2.0
     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks