Re: [Mon-devel] Desire to upgrade Mon, which one?

[David N. <vit...@cm...>]

--On Monday, February 14, 2005 5:54 PM -0500 Jim Trocki 
<tr...@tr...> wrote:


> sorry, you're correct, no objection to that tag. one thing i need to do
> is port
> a change i did in a recent -devel which makes a unified routine for
> handling
> both failures and traps (called "process_event"), and significantly
> simplifying
> the handling of both by removing lots of redundant code. it also made me
> feel better :)
>
>


I already imported those changes into the head, they're in the code that I 
tagged as 1.1.0pre1.

-David

David Nolan                    <*>                    vit...@cm...
curses: May you be forced to grep the termcap of an unclean yacc while
      a herd of rogue emacs fsck your troff and vgrind your pathalias!