Re: [Modus-devs] framework (forms)

[Brad P. <br...@ro...>]

I think I agree with you. I am not saying it is wrong, I just don't like
it. =)

The qForms examples at pengoworks.com didn't work for me. Admittedly I
am using a browser (Galeon) that isn't at the top of the "we need to
make sure our app works on these browsers" list.

Maybe it is possible to have a good user experience without client side
validation. I am not advocating one way or the other (despite my
personal preference), I just want to consider all the possibilities.

Brad

On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 12:58, Brian Ghidinelli wrote:
> 
> Client side validation is an important piece of the user experience pie. 
> It is not, however, to ensure data integrity.  A proper application
> includes both pieces.
> 
> Check out qForms at http://www.pengoworks.com.
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> Brad Pauly wrote:
> > 
> > How could I forget forms. I am not a fan of client side validation.
> > Having a way to create form fields and define there validation rules,
> > yet have it all handled for me via the framework, that would be nice.
> > Oh, and make it flexible enough so I have full control of the layout.
> > 
> > Brad
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
> on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
> for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
> http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
> _______________________________________________
> Modus-devs mailing list
> Mod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/modus-devs
> 
>