Interesting.
It looks like you are installing from source (by the install location).
When I installed 5.5.0, I used the config options: --disable-set-binpath --disable-set-manpath
Maybe you need to use: --disable-set-binpath
My copy (as installed) looks exactly like the below in that section (it is completely commented out).
if {[getState shelltype] in {sh csh fish}} {
# add Modules bin directory to PATH if enabled but do not increase ref
# counter variable if already there
##nagelfar ignore #26 Strange command
#if {{/stage/site/modules/5.5.0/bin} ni [split [get-env PATH] :]} {
#prepend-path --ignore-refcount PATH {/stage/site/modules/5.5.0/bin}
#}
# add Modules man directory to MANPATH if enabled
# initialize MANPATH if not set with a value that preserves manpath
# system configuration even after addition of paths to this variable by
# modulefiles
#set manpath {}
# use manpath tool if found at configure step, use MANPATH otherwise
##nagelfar ignore +2 Too long line
##nagelfar ignore Found constant
#catch {set manpath [exec -ignorestderr 2>/dev/null manpath]}
##if {[isEnvVarDefined MANPATH]} {
## set manpath $::env(MANPATH)
##}
#if {{/stage/site/modules/5.5.0/share/man} ni [split $manpath :]} {
# if {![isEnvVarDefined MANPATH]} {
# append-path MANPATH {}
# # ensure no duplicate ':' is set
# } elseif {[envVarEquals MANPATH :]} {
# remove-path MANPATH {}
# append-path MANPATH {}
# }
# prepend-path MANPATH {/stage/site/modules/5.5.0/share/man}
#}
}
On 2025-02-20 3:20 AM, Laurent BESSON wrote:
> Hello dear Modules community,
>
> I’m facing a strange « bug » (or « feature 😊) in Modules 5.5.0 around the definition of MANPATH variable.
>
> A bit of context before : I’m running under Redhat 7 Entreprise edition. My shell is tcsh. By default, module 3.2.0 is inititialized (defined by root in /etc/ csh.cshrc) but I’m forcing a swith to 5.5.0 in my own .tcshrc
>
> Before loading any modules, the MANPATH variable is undefined. « manpath » command is returning :
>
> In module 3.2.0 environnment :
> /usr/local/share/man:/usr/share/man/overrides:/usr/share/man
> In module 5.5.0 environnment :
> /home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/share/man:/usr/local/share/man:/usr/share/man/overrides:/usr/share/man:/home/lbesson/share/man:/dpt/adh/flow/digital/man
>
> In module 3.2.0 environnment , $PATH is returning :
> /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
> In module 5.5.0 environnment :
> /home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/bin:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
>
> Then, I’m loading a module which is adding/defining the MANPATH like this :
>
> prepend-path MANPATH /tool/platform/lsf/8.0/man
>
> After this module load, in Modules 3.2.0, MANPATH value is :
>
> /tool/platform/lsf/8.0/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/local/share/man
>
> While in Modules 5.5.0, I get this :
>
> /tool/platform/lsf/8.0/man
>
> In that case, a simple « man ls » is returning : « No manual entry for ls » . Too bad !
>
>
> When looking at the modulecmd.tcl code in 5.5.0, around line number 18266, I see this (I have removed comments to compact the lines) :
>
> if {{/home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/bin} ni [split [get-env PATH] :]} {
> prepend-path --ignore-refcount PATH {/home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/bin}
> }
>
> set manpath {}
> catch {set manpath [exec -ignorestderr 2>/dev/null manpath]}
> if {{/home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/share/man} ni [split $manpath :]} {
> if {![isEnvVarDefined MANPATH]} {
> append-path MANPATH {}
> } elseif {[envVarEquals MANPATH :]} {
> remove-path MANPATH {}
> append-path MANPATH {}
> }
> prepend-path MANPATH {/home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/share/man}
> }
>
> I think adding « /home/lbesson/Tools/Modules/5.5.0/bin » in $PATH has made « manapth » to return
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Modules-interest mailing list
> Mod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/modules-interest
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------
The views and opinions expressed above are strictly
those of the author(s). The content of this message has
not been reviewed nor approved by any entity whatsoever.
--------------------------------------------------------
Paul FM Info: http://paulfm.com/~paulfm/
--------------------------------------------------------
|