|
From: Michael D. <mdi...@gm...> - 2025-01-27 19:55:02
|
True on all accounts. I guess my question derives from there's perhaps an implied bias. either way growing the project will certainly benefit all, if there's anything we, as the community, can do to help, let us know :) On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:05 PM Xavier Delaruelle <xav...@gm...> wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > I also observed that OpenHPC is not willing to integrate Environment > Modules. But OpenHPC and Spack are two different projects run by > different people. > > As far as I know, Spack does not specifically push Lmod and works very > well with either module implementation. > > Regards, > Xavier > > Le lun. 27 janv. 2025 à 16:51, Michael DiDomenico > <mdi...@gm...> a écrit : > > > > i'm curious on what your take is on this effort is given HPSF has > > already adopted spack and spack kind of pushes lmod over > > environment-modules > > > > we use environment-modules internally and have zero plans to migrate > > to lmod, but we're also not a spack shop. we primarily pushed towards > > environment-modules, because it's pulled in via Redhat. > > > > i recall speaking with the openhpc folks a few years ago and they were > > pretty hostile at the time of supporting non-lmod/non-spack type > > stuff. not that implying any of this connected, i'm just curious > > because i don't fully understand all the players or how it's all tied > > together. > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:37 AM Xavier Delaruelle > > <xav...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I am working toward making Modules a Linux Foundation > > > (https://www.linuxfoundation.org/) project and joining the High > > > Performance Software Foundation (HPSF, https://hpsf.io/) umbrella. > > > > > > You can read and follow Modules application here: > > > https://github.com/hpsfoundation/tac/issues/22 > > > > > > Why doing that? First of all, is to make the project neutral and > > > define a clear and transparent governance. I hope this will help to > > > attract more contributors. Also being part of a well-known neutral hub > > > for high performance software (HPSF) will help to be more visible and > > > have more people interested in the project. > > > > > > The "Technical Charter" of the project is currently being drafted with > > > the Linux Foundation. You can read the current draft version here: > > > https://modules.readthedocs.io/en/latest/CHARTER.html. Modules > > > governance is adapted to match this charter: > > > https://modules.readthedocs.io/en/latest/GOVERNANCE.html. If you have > > > comments, feel free to express them here. > > > > > > One key point is to run this project as a group of people, rather just > > > me. So I am looking for people willing to join the maintainer group of > > > Modules project. > > > > > > One last thing I would like to clarify, is that these changes are not > > > done because I am quitting the project or because CEA does not support > > > it anymore. Nothing is changing there and I am still strongly > > > motivated to make Modules project progress further. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Xavier > > > _______________________________________________ > Modules-interest mailing list > Mod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/modules-interest |
