Hi Paul,
Thanks for the reply.
So, the package from the first path is selected because it is the first in the MODULEPATH, and there is an implicit default version mechanism.
But if I disable the implicit default version, I get the following error:
$> export MODULES_IMPLICIT_DEFAULT=0
$> module load jupyter-slurm
ERROR: No default version defined for 'jupyter-slurm'
Back to my original question, is there any mechanism to define a default across paths?
Best regards,
Marius
> On 22 Jan 2025, at 22:57, Paul Markfort <pau...@gm...> wrote:
>
> You should probably put /software/modules/linux/x86_64 earlier in the MODULEPATH
> A better solution, is don't use the same folder name in two module directories.
>
> It searches each folder in the MODULEPATH, until the request is satisfied.
>
> Note, I take advantage of this in testing an updated module - by using the same module name in an earlier path (a location in my home directory).
>
>
> On 2025-01-22 2:27 PM, Marius Retegan wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I apologize in advance if this is covered in documentation, but I did not manage to find an answer.
>> We have the following situation:
>> module avail jupyter-slurm
>> ------------------ /software/modules/ubuntu24.04/x86_64 ------------------
>> jupyter-slurm/2020.07.1
>> no default here. Is it using an implicit default?
>> --------------------- /software/modules/linux/x86_64 ---------------------
>> jupyter-slurm/2022.05.1 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.3 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.7
>> jupyter-slurm/2023.10.0 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.4 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.8
>> jupyter-slurm/2023.10.1 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.5 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.9
>> jupyter-slurm/2023.10.2 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.6 jupyter-slurm/2023.10.10
>> the default is set here (jupyter-slurm/2023.10.9)
>> When doing module load jupyter-slurm, the expectation is to load the 2023.10.9, the default in the second group.
>> Is it possible to define one default version across multiple paths? Thank you!
>> Best regards,
>> Marius
>> _______________________________________________
>> Modules-interest mailing list
>> Mod...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/modules-interest
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------
> The views and opinions expressed above are strictly
> those of the author(s). The content of this message has
> not been reviewed nor approved by any entity whatsoever.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Paul FM Info: http://paulfm.com/~paulfm/
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Modules-interest mailing list
> Mod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/modules-interest
|