|
From: R.K. O. Ph.D. <rk...@ow...> - 2001-10-01 18:12:42
|
> > Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > > Well, I built modules on vanilla tcl/tk 8.3.3 and tclx 8.3.0, all with > > workshop 5.0 on solaris 2.6 > > > > It's a pretty much standard stuff, the null module is > > [snip] > > > > It does the job, producing > > > > setenv _LMFILES_ '/usr/share/lib/modules/modulefiles/null';setenv > > LOADEDMODULES 'null'; > > > > whether I have "" around 3.1.5 or not. > > > > It gets quiet when "version ..." is not the last line, e.g. > > [snip] > > > > Why this stuff is position-sensitive, it beats me (apparently > > something with the way tcl decides where a statement ends). It is > > actually sufficient to add an empty line at the end of the original > > modulefile. > > > > Thanks for all who responded, > > Hello, Gintautas. > > I modified my null modulefile, and indeed it occurs on my Linux > system as well. It appears to be a bug. > > Regards, > > - Leo Butler > I've run into this problem before (and have conveniently forgotten it) and had just gotten into the habit of adding a blank line at the end of each modulefile. I'll add some verbage to the PROBLEMS file regarding this specific case. It doesn't appear to be a problem for non-Linux systems as far as I can remember, and for Linux systems it just dumps out the annoying error message: nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 nnn(18):ERROR:102: Tcl command execution failed: 3.1.5 but still correctly executes the modulefile. R.K. +------------------+---------------------+ | R.K.Owen,PhD | rk...@ow... | | KooZ Software | Environment Modules | | NERSC/LBNL | rk...@ne... | +------------------+---------------------+ |
