On 2/28/06, David Golden <da...@hy...> wrote:
> Ken Williams wrote:
> > Yup, exactly. I've now fixed that in CVS.
>
> Psst. Sourceforge now has Subversion....
>
> Please! Pretty-please! (Actually, after 0.28 would be fine.)
>
> But I'd *really* like to be able to use Subversion/SVK to hack
> Module::Build. At least for me, it would definitely lower the
> contribution hurdle. It might for others as well, particularly if you
> can allow users their own private branches they can commit to; that
> others can pull from; and that you can pull from to merge changes.
It would be cool if MB and EUMM were svn aware out of the box*. I put
Data::Dump::Streamer into SVN and was surprised to discover that when
I do an install it also installs the svn checkout folders too. Wahey,
there is an advantage to using SourceSafe after all ;-)
Yves
* This would apply to any other SC systems that is widely used and has
similar issues.
--
perl -Mre=3Ddebug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
|
