module-build-general

[Module-build-general] Ready for 0.18?

[Ken W. <ke...@ma...>]

Hi,

As Richard mentioned, a 0.18 release would be nice.  Does it pass tests 
on your platform?

  -Ken

Re: [Module-build-general] Ready for 0.18?

[Richard C. <ric...@un...>]

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:43:45AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As Richard mentioned, a 0.18 release would be nice.  Does it pass tests 
> on your platform?

All tests pass for linux on x86 and powerpc, versions 5.005_03, 5.6.1,
and 5.8.0 (though ppc 5.5.3 is skipping some of the xs tests)

-- 
Richard Clamp <ric...@un...>

Re: [Module-build-general] Ready for 0.18?

[Ken W. <ke...@ma...>]

On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 12:00  PM, Richard Clamp wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:43:45AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As Richard mentioned, a 0.18 release would be nice.  Does it pass 
>> tests
>> on your platform?
>
> All tests pass for linux on x86 and powerpc, versions 5.005_03, 5.6.1,
> and 5.8.0 (though ppc 5.5.3 is skipping some of the xs tests)

Great.  I assume it's skipping because no C compiler is found?  Is it 
correct in not finding one, or should one be found?

  -Ken

Re: [Module-build-general] Ready for 0.18?

[Richard C. <ric...@un...>]

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:05:33PM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
> 
> On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 12:00  PM, Richard Clamp wrote:
> >All tests pass for linux on x86 and powerpc, versions 5.005_03, 5.6.1,
> >and 5.8.0 (though ppc 5.5.3 is skipping some of the xs tests)
> 
> Great.  I assume it's skipping because no C compiler is found?  Is it 
> correct in not finding one, or should one be found?

It's skipping due to no compiler, but I do have one; I also have a
hunch:

% perl5.00503 -MConfig -le'print $Config{cc}'
ccache gcc-2.95

The have_compiler sub in t/xs.t seems to be taking $Config{cc} too
literally and trying to find a binary called 'ccache gcc-2.95'
somewhere in the path.

-- 
Richard Clamp <ric...@un...>