Re: [Module::Build] UNINST=1?

[Tyler M. <ty...@yi...>]

Randy W. Sims <ml...@th...> wrote:
> >It turned out I had to write "uninst=1" (lower case). I think we should
> >either support the uppercase method, or somehow change the warning message
> >that is displayed. In fact, doing both might be preferable. :) The first
> >option is trivial ... I think the second one falls into this domain:
> 
> The first option would set bad precedent. We'd then have people wanting 
> direct translations of all MakeMakeresqe options. verbose, prefix, etc. 

	Yeah, that's another thing I was going to mention. This subclassing
thing is great and all, but I really miss being able to just write a "sub
MY::postamble" to paste makefile snippets for me... can we get that put into
Module::Build as well?

	...

	Kidding! Seriously though, there's been quite the debate about
PREFIX and it sounds like people are working to get that into
Module::Build... I can understand Module::Build behaving differently where
it provides a technological advantage, but when there's a feature that's
supported by both MM and MB and the difference is just a matter of
commandline syntax or terminology, shouldn't we be making MB's syntax as
close as possible to MM's (or at least support MM's) to smooth the
transition?

	Cheers,
		Tyler