Re: 0.28 release date? (was Re: [Module::Build] Recursive builds?)

[demerphq <dem...@gm...>]

On 2/17/06, Ken Williams <ke...@ma...> wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 5:23 PM, demerphq wrote:
>
> > On 2/17/06, demerphq <dem...@gm...> wrote:
> >> On 2/16/06, Ken Williams <ke...@ma...> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:46 PM, demerphq wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Id be happy to test what you did and/or to put a new patch together
> >>>> against a more recent version if you would prefer that.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.  I did apply it, can you see whether CVS behaves as you
> >>> expect?
> >>> Ideally we'd also get some regression tests, but I'm not sure really
> >>> what to be testing so I can't really write them myself.
> >>
> >> It seems fine. Output below. I think the attached patch should be
> >> applied as it might break existing frameworks where the batch files
> >> are called directly.  I was overenethusiastic there, sorry. I have no
> >> idea what to do about the final warning message. Its harmless so
> >> probably should just be documented as a win32 quirk somewhere. As for
> >> regression tests, isn't this already existing and tested behaviour
> >> pretty well?
> >
> > And heres the latest pathtools as installed with the EU::Install patch
> > I sent out a while back.
>
> That's good, right?  Any loose threads you see around this issue?

Yep. Not really.

> Where do we stand with someone releasing a new EU::Install with that
> patch incorporated?

I could upload my copy, but its Schwerns decision really as regardless
who uploads it, it wont be indexed until he does the transfer.

Yves

--
perl -Mre=3Ddebug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"