Re: 0.28 release date? (was Re: [Module::Build] Recursive builds?)

[Ken W. <ke...@ma...>]

On Feb 16, 2006, at 5:23 PM, demerphq wrote:

> On 2/17/06, demerphq <dem...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 2/16/06, Ken Williams <ke...@ma...> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:46 PM, demerphq wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Id be happy to test what you did and/or to put a new patch together
>>>> against a more recent version if you would prefer that.
>>>
>>> Thanks.  I did apply it, can you see whether CVS behaves as you 
>>> expect?
>>> Ideally we'd also get some regression tests, but I'm not sure really
>>> what to be testing so I can't really write them myself.
>>
>> It seems fine. Output below. I think the attached patch should be
>> applied as it might break existing frameworks where the batch files
>> are called directly.  I was overenethusiastic there, sorry. I have no
>> idea what to do about the final warning message. Its harmless so
>> probably should just be documented as a win32 quirk somewhere. As for
>> regression tests, isn't this already existing and tested behaviour
>> pretty well?
>
> And heres the latest pathtools as installed with the EU::Install patch
> I sent out a while back.

That's good, right?  Any loose threads you see around this issue?

Where do we stand with someone releasing a new EU::Install with that 
patch incorporated?

  -Ken