[Module::Build] Re: something broken between Module::Build, CPAN.pm, and ExtUtils::MakeMaker in 5.
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
|
From: John P. <jpe...@ro...> - 2006-02-14 20:30:56
|
Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > Chromatic <chr...@wg...> writes: >> M::B provides the minimal features to get the module built, tested, and >> installed. The bare tarball doesn't. No slope. > > I would like to switch to module build but AFAIK it still can't > do nested builds. That discussion is happening on the Module-Build list even now. The problem is that what "nested build" means is different for different people. Personally, I'd like blib/lib and blib/arch to contain all sub blib's below the current one (strictly speaking a recursive build). And at any level, a './Build command' will run all lower level ./Build files with the same command depth-first. Is this what EUMM does now? This seems to be what GNU automake/autoconf seems to expect. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 |