Re: [Module::Build] [RFC] author tests

[Ken W. <ke...@ma...>]

On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:

> # from Tyler MacDonald
> # on Thursday 02 February 2006 10:01 am:
>
>> Whatever convention you're using, if these tests are only going to
>> work on your system, then they definately shouldn't be in "t".
>
> There is a good case for that, particularly in reverse-compatibility.

Nah.  Just don't name them *.t, as Chris originally suggested, and they 
won't cause any trouble in t/.  I like the *.ta or *.at idea.

  -Ken