Re: [Module::Build] [RFC] author tests
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
|
From: Christopher H. L. <cl...@ch...> - 2006-02-02 21:06:44
|
Chris Dolan wrote: > On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Tyler MacDonald wrote: >=20 >> If they're not a developer, what are they doing running unit tests= >> in the first place??? End users typically install applications, which >> either >> prebundle a whole bunch of perl packages or rely on some package >> management >> system (ppm, deb, etc) to separate real dependancies from build >> dependancies >> for them and only install what they need. >=20 > The end users may be in a different environment from me. I usually onl= y > tests Perl 5.8.6 on OS X and Linux before release, so I rely on other > installers to provide bug reports for me. >=20 >> I think in this case Test::Pod should be a build_requires... Your >> other examples (copyright.t, etc) obviously will only work on your >> system so >> it makes sense for those to have some sort of special treatment. >=20 > Test::Pod is different from general regression tests. POD should eithe= r > pass on all systems or fail on all. In what scenario would POD fail on= > a non-developer system. =20 Manifying problems...ala troff/pod2html/pod2man issues.... -=3DChris |