Re: [Module::Build] [RFC] author tests

[David G. <da...@hy...>]

Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> I guess I'm undecided on this.  On the one hand, the *.ta convention is 
> going to break the test juggler with which I've recently been 
> experimenting, but on the other it means there is less 'whoami' code in 
> the tests.  An example of my current whoami-based approach is below.

My thought was that if someone wants to use *.ta files or a ta/*.t 
directory, they can still do so by subclassing in Build.PL and having a 
custom authortest action that includes those files.

David