Re: [Module::Build] Moving to perforce?

[Autrijus T. <aut...@au...>]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:29:18PM +1100, Iain Truskett wrote:
> * Elizabeth Mattijsen (li...@di...) [22 Dec 2003 20:23]:
> [...]
> > I know that Subversion has been tried for the Ponie
> > project. I think I can still hear Arthur scream whenever
> > Subversion gets mentioned. It was particularly difficult
> > to get any performance out of it with a relatively large
> > number of branches.
> 
> Not that M::B will have quite so many branches as Perl.

Blatant plug:  I've been using svk for a while to monitor
6 svn repositories (4 of which I also commit to), and in
addition to its bitkeeper-like offline working ability,
I also find svk to be much faster than svn's command line
client, approaching the speed of p4.

And since it's written in pure perl, it's also easily
hackable. :-)

    http://svk.elixus.org/

Thanks,
/Autrijus/