Re: [Module::Build] Moving to perforce?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
|
From: Elizabeth M. <li...@di...> - 2003-12-22 09:23:30
|
At 22:30 -0600 12/21/03, Dave Rolsky wrote: >On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Ken Williams wrote: > > I'd like to eventually move Module::Build development to perforce. I > > can import the CVS history from the sourceforge project. I've set up a > > server in my house on my DSL line. Not real heavy-duty, but it should > > suffice. > > Any objections? >I for one prefer to use free software when possible. What's so great >about Perforce that we shouldn't use it instead of Arch, Subversion, or >one of a bazillion other free alternatives? I know that Subversion has been tried for the Ponie project. I think I can still hear Arthur scream whenever Subversion gets mentioned. It was particularly difficult to get any performance out of it with a relatively large number of branches. I don't know about the bazillion other free alternatives. Liz |