Re: [Module::Build] codebase? paths in .tar.gz?

[Dave R. <au...@ur...>]

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Randy W. Sims wrote:

> I wavered a bit when working on the patch. I definately think that a PPD
> file should not be released without all of the above information. I
> guess the only concern I have is if a module does something abnormal
> like putting the pod in a separate pod file, so that M::B doesn't find
> the abstract; at least the author could manually fix the PPD file. But,
> maybe it should just die, and if anyone runs into anything reasonably
> abnormal we can make the appropriate change.

I think it would be better to die and then add code to accomodate this.

For example, we could do something like add a "ppd_info_file" constructor
argument so that M::B would like there for the abstract & author info.


-dave

/*=======================
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
=======================*/