Re: [Module::Build] [PATCH] make test failure report (Cygwin)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
|
From: Randy W. S. <Ra...@Th...> - 2003-10-15 04:52:24
|
On 10/14/2003 11:04 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote: > PS. I've attached output of the error I'm getting from t/runthrough.t on > Win2k for the archives. > > not ok 23# Test 23 got: '<SOFTPKG NAME="Sample" VERSION="0,01,0,0"> > > <TITLE>Sample</TITLE> > </ABSTRACT>CT>Foo foo sample foo > <AUTHOR>Sample Man <sa...@ex...></AUTHOR> > <IMPLEMENTATION> > <DEPENDENCY NAME="File-Spec" VERSION="0,0,0,0" /> > <CODEBASE HREF="/path/to/codebase" /> > </IMPLEMENTATION> > </SOFTPKG> > ' (t/runthrough.t at line 130) > # Expected: '<SOFTPKG NAME="Sample" VERSION="0,01,0,0"> > <TITLE>Sample</TITLE> > <ABSTRACT>Foo foo sample foo</ABSTRACT> > <AUTHOR>Sample Man <sa...@ex...></AUTHOR> > <IMPLEMENTATION> > <DEPENDENCY NAME="File-Spec" VERSION="0,0,0,0" /> > <CODEBASE HREF="/path/to/codebase" /> > </IMPLEMENTATION> > </SOFTPKG> > ' > Deleting Sample.ppd > Deleting save_out > Deleting Sample-0.01.tar.gz > Deleting lib/Sample/Script > Deleting blib > Deleting _build > Deleting Build And here is the patch to fix it; It seems the line ending in the abstract was causing trouble. BTW, wouldn't it be better to use Pod::Parser in the dist_* routines for more acurate results? This gets Cygwin Win2k working. Now I got figure out what is happening on Win9x. Randy. |