[Module-build-general] Re: META.yaml in Module-Build dist
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
From: Ken W. <ke...@ma...> - 2002-08-14 00:05:28
|
Hi Graham, You're right, I'll change the name to the distribution name. Regarding the version, it should be settable in the Build.PL if it doesn't come from a module, just like in MakeMaker. Is there something that needs fixing there? Perhaps the 'module_name', 'module_version', and 'module_version_from' parameters are misnamed in the new() method, since they (should) really refer to the distribution, not a module. Is this what you mean? Thanks for the suggestions. -Ken On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, at 12:44 AM, Graham Barr wrote: > Ken, > > I am looking forward to having a meta file in distributions so > that search can start using it. However I was reading the fail > in the Module-Build distribution. It contains the line > > name: Module::Build > > I would suggest that this is wrong. A distribution is not one module > and the meta file should be about the distribution. IMO that line > should be > > name: Module-Build > > consider distributions like libnet, libwww-perl or any other > distribution that contains many modules. > > The same goes for the version. In these distribution that > have many modules, the version of the distribution is > not always extracted from one of the modules. > > Graham. |