Re: [Module::Build] What to do? What to do?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
From: Eric W. <scr...@gm...> - 2006-04-10 17:50:38
|
# from Ken Williams # on Monday 10 April 2006 10:08 am: >The only reservation I'd have about a wiki would be that it would =A0 >dilute the mailing list and RT, so that now there'd be three places =A0 >to look instead of two. =A0But that may not be a very serious problem =A0 >if it brings tangible benefits. =A0And it would also be nice to let =A0 >people use the wiki for cookbook-like postings. Maybe BP is heading in the direction of integrating these three forums=20 with Jifty? I think they each serve a particular purpose. RT - bugs and coherent (i.e. with tests or patches) feature requests ML - ongoing discussions Wiki - persistent, somewhat organized, collaborative store of data Most people are comfortable with their existing mail client and most of=20 those clients have the "offline mode" issue solved (sorry google, gmail=20 is not the way of the future.) The "everybody has a browser" syndrome doesn't really cut it for me. =20 IMO, most BUI interfaces are somehow crippled compared to what can be=20 done with a desktop client. Besides the obvious limitation of an=20 offline mode, the fact is that javascript just won't get you *good*=20 cross-browser keyboard shortcuts. Also, expecting the data to be on=20 the server makes it difficult for anyone to really try a new idea. I=20 guess you can say I'm holding out for web 3.0 where we realize that=20 network-connected desktop clients are a good thing :-) To come to a point, maybe something like zim could handle the RT/Wiki=20 aspects. What's needed is distributed backends to RT and a wiki. To=20 me, that says that both need to cut ties to the SQL DB, but that's just=20 a guess at a low-level detail. What should the M::B team do in the meantime? =2D-Eric =2D-=20 =2D-------------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com =2D-------------------------------------------------- |