Re: [Module::Build] SF.net is not long for this M::B world

[Randy W. S. <ml...@th...>]

Ken Williams wrote:
> So finally I get some time to look at a few M::B issues, and CVS seems 
> to be down.  I see this note on the sourceforge status page:
> 
>  ( 2006-03-23 10:28:40 - Project CVS Service )   2006-03-23: Starting at 
> 19:00 PST, CVS services will be unavailable for approximately 8 hours as 
> part of routine maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
> 
> Of course, up above on the same page, CVS status is listed as "Online".
> 
> I'm tired of both CVS itself and these outages, so other than just 
> complaining publicly, I'm announcing that we'll switch to subversion 
> once we generate the 0.28 release, and perhaps try to move to the 
> svn.perl.org server too.  I don't know if it's more reliable or not, but 
> for some reason I'm sure it would be less frustrating.

I'm not overly fond of sf either. Most of my complaints have been about 
the mailing list which is where I run into the most problems by far. 
I've only ran into a few bumps with cvs, but I'm all for the change.

Is the mailing list going to be moved over to the perl.org server also? 
Will we be able to update gmane.org to the new list?

Where will the META.yml spec go?

Randy.