[Module::Build] Re: [PATCH] add Module::Build 0.27_08

[Yitzchak Scott-T. <sth...@ef...>]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:59:17AM -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> Ah, this is because we don't expect to be run from a non-installed perl. 
> Notice we pretty much throw $^X away if it's not absolute? Is there any 
> reason we can't add:
> 
>   return $^X if $proto->_perl_is_same($^X);
> 
> at the top of find_perl_interpreter(). Or do we need to be more guarded?
> 
> Randy.

It looks like find_perl_interpreter is supposed to return an absolute
path, so my similar suggestion does that.  Do you know how the return
value is used?