Re: [Module::Build] should Pod::Readme vs. Pod::Text for README creation be a feature?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
kwilliams
|
From: Yitzchak Scott-T. <sth...@ef...> - 2006-03-07 16:12:18
|
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:10:34PM -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote: > Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >I'd rather see YAML added to recommends than Pod::Readme removed. > > That's not what you said in your initial mail: ;) > > >>>Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >Just as META.yml can be forced to build with or without YAML by setting > >the YAML_feature, shouldn't README creation depend on a feature? > <<< > > >Seems to me they both fit the mission statement of recommends. > > I guess it could go either way. I tend to favor features because it > gives the author has a chance to describe to the user exactly what > functionality is disabled because of which missing dependencies. I don't see any problem with having both. recommends is for build tools to be able to suggest installing modules that allow the fullest feature-set. features allow an author to set their personal policy, and have things croak if there are missing modules rather than falling back to something less capable. |