Re: [Modeling-users] slooow delete
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: John L. <jl...@gm...> - 2005-03-15 16:44:45
|
On 11 Mar 2005 22:19:37 +0100, Sebastien Bigaret <sbi...@us...> wrote: > > *Big fat warning* (!): do that if you're absolutely sure that the > related 'need', 'team' and 'mealType' objects are not already > fetched in other ECs, *or*, if they are fetched, that the "inverse" > tomany faults are not cleared. If I read you correctly then I'm safe, because I never do need.setTasks(None) (is this what you mean by clearing the tomany faults?) > > Respectively, check that (for 'need', same for 'team' and > 'mealType'): > > db=ec.rootObjectStore().objectStoreForObject(task).database() > > task_need_gID=task.getNeed().globalID() > db.snapshotForGlobalID(task_need_gID=task) # None if unfetched yet > > and if it's not None: > > db.snapshotForSourceGlobalID(task_need_gID, 'tasks') # should be () > > Otherwise you may experience weird side-effects on the corresponding > objects already fetched in other ECs, esp. when saving them (no > pb. if you use a single EC in the app., however). I'm not clear what the purpose of this is: is it to ensure that the task.setMeal(None) is safe? basically what I'll be doing, unless you tell me otherwise, is: - for creating, do the task.setMeal(meal) but not the meal.addToTasks(task) - for deleteing, do the task.setMeal(None) but not the meal.removeFromTasks(task) given that I never, ever (promise! :D) clear the tasks, and that I always saveChanges after deleteing or creating each task, although I have many editingContexts (inside zope, one per session using ZEditingContextSessioning), it is my understanding that I'll be safe. Right? -- John Lenton (jl...@gm...) -- Random fortune: Don't anthropomorphise computers and cars, They hate that. |