Re: [Modeling-users] model for tests

[John L. <jl...@gm...>]

On 08 Oct 2004 10:58:04 +0200, Sebastien Bigaret
<sbi...@us...> wrote:
> 
> John Lenton <jl...@gm...> wrote:
> > to test one of the patches I'd need a model to have a relation to an
> > entity that has subclasses; although StoreEmployee has such a relation
> > (Holidays <<-> Employee), it doesn't define the toOne side of that
> > relation, and I notice that is used to test exactly that feature.
> > Should I create a new model that has these properties, or do I add a,
> > say, 'Salary' class?
> 
> Yes, go for it and modify the model.  Maybe a BankAccount class could
> make more sense?  Okay, anyway that's a test model, so the semantics is
> not that important :)

last night I uploaded a patch that called it 'Salary', but I'll rename
it to  'BankAccount' in a while.

-- 
John Lenton (jl...@gm...) -- Random fortune:
bash: fortune: command not found