Re: [Modeling-users] Database Connections
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Duncan M. <py...@ad...> - 2004-08-06 23:02:19
|
On Aug 6, 2004, at 3:33 PM, Sebastien Bigaret wrote: > Now, this can be fine... or not, depending on the type of application > you're currently building (I mean, its characteristics, esp. if you can > expect heavy load). We're expecting very light load. > For example, say that some of fetches can take some time --can you wait > for a fetch to be finished before serving others? We are expecting that there will be some delays perceived by users during regular use as you describe here. This is okay :-) > If your app. does not > fetch a lot, maybe it's not a pb, but if most of its requests end up > with one or more ec.fetch() then the default behaviour will probably > not > be suitable. > > And again, could you be more explicit whether in your first mail you > meant that "for each session's EC there exists one and only one > connection to the db"?? Sorry about responding so late; did my last email make this more clear, or should I send along more details/better explanation? |