Re: [Modeling-users] Re: initial value of required fields

[Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...>]

John Lenton <jl...@gm...> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:42 -0300, John Lenton <jl...@gm...> wrote:
> > S=E9bastien, would having an option for required fields being
> > initialized to non-null values be ok with you?
> >=20
> > In a project I'm overseeing the team finds it unnatural that a
> > required field that isn't filled in won't raise an exception, and I
> > thought the easy way out (while I thump them with a
> > validate-everything stick) would be to make it optional...

Sorry, but I'm not sure to understand: are you facing situations where
objects with None value in required field did not make ec.saveChanges()
raise?

> FWIW, now they're using defaultValue to do the same thing... and maybe
> that's enough.

If tyhis is just a matter of initialization then yes, the default values
should be enough, or am I missing something?

-- S=E9bastien.