Re: [Modeling-users] N-tier development and modeling
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Federico H. <fh...@vi...> - 2004-03-11 01:58:40
|
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 18:45, Tom Hallman wrote: > Thanks for that input. A question - would using such a method (via Pyro= ,=20 > etc.) bind us to using clients exclusively written in Python? For example= ,=20 > if we wanted a client to be written in PHP or Java, we wouldn't be able t= o=20 > use that Distributed Objects method. Is that correct? I'm not familiar with Pyro at all, so I'm afraid I can't comment on that. If it were properly implemented, you ought to be able to cross language boundaries (I remember java apps could call Distributed Objects at some point in history), but certain assumptions would have to be true in the target language. For instance, it would have to implement some form of true message passing, and not mere polymorphism (i.e. no C++). Fede --=20 GnuPG Public Key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-key BD02C6E0 Key Fingerprint: 04F4 08C5 14B7 2C3D DB21 ACF8 6CF5 0B0C BD02 C6E0 |