Re: [Modeling-users] Another question about sessions and EditingContexts (sorry)
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Ernesto R. <er...@si...> - 2004-03-01 12:41:32
|
Dear S=E9bastien, Yes, actually I have time to do some testing in a test environment (no = production) with sqlite and Postgresql. (And I'm sorry I couldn't help = you with python metaclasses in the past.) I'm also very interested in = optimistic locking.=20 With best regards,=20 Erny ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Sebastien Bigaret" <sbi...@us...> To: "Ernesto Revilla" <er...@si...> Cc: "modeling-users" <mod...@li...> Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 2:37 PM Subject: Re: [Modeling-users] Another question about sessions and = EditingContexts (sorry) "Ernesto Revilla" <er...@si...> wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > as stated in the documentation, section 6. Integration in an = application, > using an application server, actually it is recomended to use a fresh > EditingContext for each session. But it states also, that changes made > permanent with saveChanges will not be visible to other = EditingContexts. Is > the also the case for Zope ZEditingContextSessioning? Could anybody = tell me > in which environment she/he uses modeling, and how he treats the > EditingContexts? (I'm looking for application server like uses.) This is the case in every multi-ECs environment, including Zope and ZECSessioning. I currently have the intention of solving that longstanding issue of synchronizing ECs --and this is a prerequisite for optimistic locking. Would you have some time testing patches on that topic? -- S=E9bastien. |