[Modeling-users] Suggestion for user manual
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Ernesto R. <er...@si...> - 2004-02-24 14:26:57
|
Dear S=E9bastien, (I think, in the last message I didn't put correctly the accent.) In section 2.3.4: Relationship In deleteRule: The entity in your example is not 'Author' but 'Writer'. On the other = hand, the relationships are called there: * author and * books not: toAuthor and toBooks. Perhaps, there could be a clarification of the UML notation, so that the = behaviour of modeling would be a bit clearer for persons without = knowledge of UML. I attach it here for your consideration. Best regards, Erny Dear S=E9bastien, (I think, in the last message I didn't put correctly the accent.) In section 2.3.4: Relationship In deleteRule: The entity in your example is not 'Author' but 'Writer'. On the other = hand, the relationships are called there: * author and * books not: toAuthor and toBooks. Perhaps, there could be a clarification of the UML notation, so that the = behaviour of modeling would be a bit clearer for persons without = knowledge of UML. I attach it here for your consideration. Best regards, Erny |