Re: [Modeling-users] Request for testers: dynamic creation of classes from a model

[Mario R. <ma...@ru...>]

[please disregard earlier email from me on this subject]

Hi.

sorry i did not do this earlier, but i finally managed to give some time
to it. I ran the tests after installing NF 0.6, and the dynamic patch  
over
the latest installation of the framework, with python 2.2 (stock apple
compilation) and running on OSX 10.2.6. I am testing with a Postgresql
server (but never gets this far).

> I've just submitted patch #814055 at:
> https://sf.net/tracker/ 
> index.php?func=detail&aid=814055&group_id=58935&atid=489337

I have added the log of each test to the issue above.
Note there is also a problem with the general test run.py, the
log of which is also added.

Anyway, I am not sure I understand all the benefits of this intriguing
new feature, but does this also mean, in particular in option 3  
(metaclass)
that one can just manually define "CustomObject" classes by specifying
only the custom python code for that class, and never have to worry
about merging with the regenerated modules after model changes?

Also, why 3 ways of doing it? Experimental? Will you pick what
is the better of the 3, and stick with that one?

Cheers, mario