Re: [Modeling-users] Re: Implementing inheritance through vertical mapping
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Yannick G. <ygi...@yg...> - 2003-09-29 21:59:58
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On September 27, 2003 05:37, Mario Ruggier wrote: > I see the XML just as an exchange format for a model, if you need > to import, generate or export a model definition _programmatically_. > IMHO, to develop your XML by hand is silly, as it is ugly, way too > verbose, and very obscure and un-expressive -- it is very difficult > (for me ;) to visualize a model from its XML definition. So, the XML > should only be manipulated by tools -- in which case it does not > matter whether properties are flattened or not. As I said some time ago, we use Datadesigner [1] to make our XML model and than we pass it to a DOM transformation tool to have a Modeling friendly document. XML is really easy to morph ! [1] : http://www.danny.cz/datadesigner.en.html =2D --=20 Yannick Gingras Coder for OBB : Observingly Blighted B.th.u. http://OpenBeatBox.org =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/dYmKrhy5Fqn/MRARAl4LAJ9votpKlqT4RO60sXV3tuy9Gh+kdQCfWz8p eD/mKUkOth7p9SaXppCvAd8=3D =3DFYDg =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |