Re: [Modeling-users] Optimistic Locking

[Federico H. <fh...@vi...>]

On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 07:05, Ernesto Revilla wrote:
> I agree with Fede that this should be one of the priorities, cause it
> has so many positive effects:
> we can let modeling run in a 'heavy client', although this is not an
> approach that I like, because I want the business logic on the server,
> but....
> we can do load balancing with more servers, we can use different
> editing contexts for each session, as already done with Zope, and
> detect easily any update collisions. Each application should handle
> collisions on it's own way.

I agree that "heavy client" is not generally the way to go. However, if
you solve that problem in a clean way, then you *know* everything else
will work as well, and some interesting applications (like the load
balancing you mention) become much easier.

> I don't agree with Heinz on the fetch problem, because:

As to this moment, I'm afraid I don't agree with Heinz either :-)

	Fede