Re: [Modeling-users] Optimistic Locking

[Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...>]

Sebastien Bigaret <sbi...@us...> wrote:
> "Ernesto Revilla" <er...@si...> wrote:
> > I agree with Fede that this should be one of the priorities, cause it h=
as so many positive effects:
> > we can let modeling run in a 'heavy client', although this is not an ap=
proach that I like, because I want the business logic on the server, but....
> > we can do load balancing with more servers, we can use different editin=
g contexts for each session, as already done with Zope, and detect easily a=
ny update collisions. Each application should handle collisions on it's own=
 way.
>=20
>   Absolutely, and I'll definitely post a plan for it this we.=20

I thought I'd have the time, but unfortunately I did not. That will be
for the next few days, sorry for the delay.

-- S=E9bastien.