Re: [Modeling-users] Reply-to header
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...> - 2003-07-23 19:42:12
|
Jerome Kerdreux <Jer...@fi...> wrote: > Hum It's work fine except that after I post something > in a thread the default reply to will be the list not the > user . So it works for me but this will break the default > policy . Well, unless I misunderstand you that's exactly what it was intended for :) Since some of you complained about the Reply-To not being set for the list, this directive for procmail allows them to choose to add it on their own, and, yes, to break the default policy on their own configuration. So since it's impossible to conciliate the pro- and the anti-reply-to, at least with this, one can choose on which side one stands! Thanks for testing. I'll add this to the welcome message of the list. -- S=E9bastien. |