[Modeling-users] Reply-to header
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
|
From: Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...> - 2003-07-23 15:43:19
|
Hi all, Some of you have asked if the reply-to header could be automatically set. I already replied that I won't, mainly (& shortly) because I agree with the why-it-is-considered-harmful arguments. However, there's no reason why you should not set it yourself if you want to. It seems that a very simple procmail rule can do the trick, see for example: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fisher-list/2001-February/msg00391.html https://mail.fukt.bth.se/pipermail/crux/2003-June/000588.html http://www.wecs.com/replytorc.htm I've never used procmail myself so I'm not able to post here the exact rule for the list, but if some of you try makes this successfully it might be a good idea to share with others. I'll probably add it to the welcome message of the mailing-list, then. Regards, -- S=E9bastien. |