Re: [Modeling-users] Request for specific adaptors?
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...> - 2003-06-10 16:05:10
|
Hi, Mario> Yes, in fact SQLite or Gadfly are certainly better choices for the Mario> cases I described... Mario>=20 Mario> S=E9bastien, do you think you will integrate the SQLite adapter Mario> you had announced some time ago, for 0.9? Yes, it will be integrated in 0.9 (and possibly before). Soif> If fact the only problem for me is that all of this requires some Soif> special DBApi adapter in C on the server. As i host some website Soif> on a friend box, this avoid me to use some C adapter (same issue Soif> on python-hosting.com for example) . That's why gadfly is=20 Soif> interesting no ?=20 Well, in a way you're right, however it lacks a lot of functionalities, for example: no NULL, no Date, Time, and Interval data types, no LIKE string predicate. (cf. gadfly.sf.net/sql.html) Plus another thing I do not understand (or do I?) << Cursor based updates and deletes (justification: if you really need them the db design is flawed, and it's possible to use python instead). >> --> does it really mean you cannot INSERT/UPDATE on a cursor?? BTW, making a gadfly adaptor means that every non-supported feature should be detected and reported as such; I don't want to do this by now but if anyone feels like starting it I'll help for sure. You're also mentioning python-hosting.com: "plan 1" lets you use firebird, I guess it's probably a better choice there. If there is interest for that one I'll make the effort. Cheers, -- S=E9bastien. |