Re: [Modeling-users] Request for specific adaptors?
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Soaf <so...@la...> - 2003-06-01 23:42:33
|
> I have recently felt that an adaptor to a non-relational db server would > be very nice -- useful for simple applications (and installations of) > and/or > quick prototyping, but will allow that the same application be easily > "scaled-up" > to a relational server (with no changes to the data model). > This does not equate to simple object persistence (e.g. any of several > such schemes available, from pickle to zodb, etc.). It is also not about > performance ;-!. It is about giving a very high-level separation between > the application objects, and the back-end, that will also allow > switching > between SQL and non-SQL storage. I am in particular thinking of > something like bsddb, with string values (rows) that are simply > repr(dict). > Then searching and filtering can still be achieved without modifying > any client code (albeit very inefficiently!). The advantage is that > small applications that do not do so much searching and filtering > do not suffer very much, and they can be installed a lot simpler > (requiring only to make sure to have write access to some directory, > as opposed to setting up an sql server). But, the power of the model > is still at hand, on which the application can build... > > mario This is a good idea, since I usually don't use modeling for small stuff as i need to use a big SQL server w/. PySQLITE is really a great stuff i think my next dev about modeling will use this. Perhaps we should look at gadfly ? (or ZODB + SQL ) |