Re: [Modeling-users] Roadmap to 0.9

[Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...>]

Mario Ruggier <ma...@ru...> writes:
> > Mario wrote:
> >>> An issue that probably should be resolved before 0.9 is the name of
> >>> the framework. This implies a lot, though...
> >>
> >> 1.0 hopefully ;)
> >
> > I did not read you right, I initially read *after* 0.9
>=20
> Well, in my opinion the longer one uses a name the harder it is to change=
 it.
> So, the sooner the better. But, it implies a lot of little changes, and i=
t is
> up to
> you as whether it should be done now or not. Is there a pressing deadline
> for 0.9, or is the date fixed arbitrarily?

No pressing deadline, it's just that we already have a one-month drift wrt =
the
initial planning :\

  I'll try to summarize the "little changes" and I'll get back on the subje=
ct
  then. We also have the former name proposals in the archives, they can be
  easily collected.

-- S=E9bastien.