Re: [Modeling-users] working in unicode?
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Yannick G. <ygi...@yg...> - 2003-04-22 11:18:40
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 22 April 2003 06:38, you wrote: > One step up, two steps back... but i guess support for this will > eventually come. If i understand correctly with postgres, you can > send a select query in unicode directly, and a case insensitive > condition should work... But the middle layer does not support this > unfortunately... Ah well... But you were wright, the lack of case-insensitive search is far less evil than the field length expansion when working with utf-8 encoded data. Shouldn't Modeling allocate enough space to store 8 char of any language if I say that I want 8 chars for some property ? It should not be the application programmer's job to know all the technicalities of utf-8 encoding. That's one of the use we have for comments now, we say the field intended length and we put the "physical" length in the model... IMHO, the is a ugly hack. - -- Yannick Gingras Coder for OBB : Overlooked Biogeographical Backseat http://OpenBeatBox.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+pSUMrhy5Fqn/MRARAqhIAJ4w7thSD8RZ033RdyfCKh4UsmDxhACeLVXU BeTPC1XmC+P6/KSzsDkRqEU= =qabP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |