Re: [Modeling-users] Roadmap to 0.9 - connectionDictionary
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
From: Mario R. <ma...@ru...> - 2003-04-22 10:31:22
|
While we are making changes to the model... ;) - I really do not like having the connectionDictionary written out all=20= over the place in xml files, some of which generated and copied around. Is it possible to externalize this? (Maybe I am missing something?) The connDict should at maximum be written on disk only once (this will automatically be possibly with PyModels...). Also (a different request) passwords should not be written in the clear. Is it possible to send encrypted passwords to the db server? - Another minor request, that can wait; would it be possible to make entity/@name the default for both entity/@className and=20 entity/@externalName, should these two not be specified in the XML model? mario On mardi, avr 22, 2003, at 11:57 Europe/Amsterdam, Sebastien Bigaret=20 wrote: > Yannick Gingras <ygi...@yg...> writes: >> On Sunday 20 April 2003 09:05, Sebastien Bigaret wrote: >>> Last addition: I remember Yannick Gingras saying that it can be >>> useful to be able to comment on a model -- 1.0 will add a comment >>> attribute in Model, Entity, Attribute and Relationship. >> >> Woohoo ! >> > > Obviously I meant 0.9, and this is now done in the CVS (Modeling and > ZModelizationTool updated) > > -- S=E9bastien. |