Re: [Modeling-users] Roadmap to 0.9

[Mario R. <ma...@ru...>]

> Mario wrote:
>>> An issue that probably should be resolved before 0.9 is the name of
>>> the framework. This implies a lot, though...
>>
>> 1.0 hopefully ;)
>
> I did not read you right, I initially read *after* 0.9

Well, in my opinion the longer one uses a name the harder it is to=20
change it.
So, the sooner the better. But, it implies a lot of little changes, and=20=

it is up to
you as whether it should be done now or not. Is there a pressing=20
deadline
for 0.9, or is the date fixed arbitrarily?

mario

> Should we choose and apply the new name for 0.9? It seems unreasonable=20=

> to me,
> we have ~one week and yes, this implies a lot.
>
> -- S=E9bastien.