Re: [Modeling-users] Roadmap to 0.9

[Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...>]

Mario wrote:
> > An issue that probably should be resolved before 0.9 is the name of
> > the framework. This implies a lot, though...
>=20
> 1.0 hopefully ;)

I did not read you right, I initially read *after* 0.9

Should we choose and apply the new name for 0.9? It seems unreasonable to m=
e,
we have ~one week and yes, this implies a lot.

-- S=E9bastien.